Facebook Comments Can Get Media Firms Sued in Australia - AppMasterWorld.com
Saturday, July 2, 2022
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Sitemap
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
AppMasterWorld.com
  • Home
  • News
  • SOCIAL MEDIA
  • SAAS APPS
    • Marketing
    • Business
    • Creative Apps
    • Management Apps
    • Productivity Apps
    • Saas offers
  • GAMING
  • INDUSTRY
No Result
View All Result
AppMasterWorld.com
No Result
View All Result

Facebook Comments Can Get Media Firms Sued in Australia

September 24, 2021
in News, SOCIAL MEDIA

Dylan Voller was already a polarizing figure in Australia when the disturbing, violent and demonstrably false accusations against him began to appear on Facebook.

Mr. Voller had become famous overnight in 2016 after a television news exposé on the mistreatment of juveniles in the country’s criminal detention system broadcast a photograph of him, at age 17, hooded and strapped to a chair by guards. The image, likened by some to those of prisoners at Abu Ghraib in Iraq, shocked many Australians, prompting a national investigation.

Beneath articles about the investigation written by major Australian news outlets and posted to their Facebook pages, several commenters attacked Mr. Voller. Some made false accusations, including that Mr. Voller had raped an elderly woman and attacked a Salvation Army volunteer with a fire extinguisher, blinding him.

Instead of confronting the commenters directly, Mr. Voller sued the news media outlets, arguing that they were defaming him by permitting the comments on their Facebook pages. Crucially, he didn’t ask them to pull down the comments before filing his lawsuit, essentially arguing that they should be liable for comments they might not even be aware of.

“The comments were getting shared around, and I worried that people would think they were true,” Mr. Voller said.

His victory this month before the country’s top court could be a blow to Facebook’s ability to draw eyeballs to its content. It also further muddies the waters in a global debate over who should be held liable for what is said on social media.

Mr. Voller must still prove he was defamed. But in response to the top court’s decision that the media outlets could be held liable for online comments from others, some Australian news outlets are reconsidering what kinds of content they put on Facebook, potentially limiting engagement with readers.

“We won’t post stories about politicians, Indigenous issues, court decisions, anything that we feel could get a problematic reaction from readers,” said Dave Earley, audience editor at Guardian Australia.

Facebook has added a feature that allows a page administrator to entirely turn off comments on a post. But Mr. Earley said the platform had been reluctant to offer more finely tuned options for moderation because comments drive engagement — a key to Facebook’s business model.

“It’s to their benefit for there to be comments on everything,” Mr. Earley said.

Facebook did not respond to requests for comment about Mr. Voller’s lawsuit.

For Facebook, which has long insisted that it is a neutral vessel for public discourse, the court’s ruling may offer a type of indirect amnesty. While the company may still face defamation suits in Australia, plaintiffs there will be more likely to take local people and media companies to court.

And if adopted more widely, the view endorsed by Australia’s court could stifle the sort of freewheeling discourse that often keeps users glued to social media.

The ruling extends liability for user comments to anyone with a public Facebook page, not just news outlets. For example, the administrator of a Facebook community could be sued for comments left under a post, even if the administrator was unaware of them.

The Australian ruling comes at a moment when many places around the world are grappling with how to assign accountability for what is said on social media. In the United States, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act holds that online platforms have automatic immunity from what people say in third-party comments.

The legislation, which has been called a “gift to the internet” because of its pro-speech stance, has recently come under scrutiny from both sides of the political spectrum, though for opposite reasons. Democrats have argued that Section 230 should be repealed so that social media companies can be held accountable for misinformation and hate speech spreading widely on their platforms. Republicans who dislike the law say online platforms are using it to silence conservative views.

Elsewhere, in an extreme attempt to legislate against moderation, President Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil tried but failed to bar social media companies from removing inflammatory or misleading content, including his claims that if he loses the election next year the results will have been rigged. The British Parliament is considering a plan to give media regulators the power to force platforms to remove illegal and harmful content.

Still, the wide reach of the Australian decision makes the country an “extreme outlier,” said Daphne Keller, director of the platform regulation program at Stanford University’s Cyber Policy Center.

The most comparable measure, she said, was a 2015 ruling in the European Court of Human Rights that said the owner of an online forum can be liable for harmful comments left there, even before the owner realizes it. But a European court a year later said the ruling applied only to hate speech, not defamation.

“The court held that a rule like this would violate internet users’ fundamental right for freedom of expression,” Ms. Keller said.

While the Australian ruling directly affects only Facebook page administrators in the country, it could have global implications. In 2002, a court ruled that an Australian citizen could sue an American media company for a defamatory article published overseas. At the time, the ruling was characterized as a “devastating blow to free speech online,” potentially obliging publishers to censor themselves. In the United States, legislation was later passed to make such a foreign defamation ruling unenforceable.

But with this new ruling, Australian residents could still go after international media companies with bureaus outside the United States for any comment ever left on their social media pages.

“The concern is that this will make Australia a magnet for international defamation disputes,” Matt Collins, an Australian lawyer and defamation expert, said.

Even before Australia’s top court backed Mr. Voller, the young man who sued the media outlets, his argument had prevailed in a lower court and had already been felt throughout the country. Last year, the owner of a community Facebook page for a wealthy suburb of Sydney shut it down after receiving the threat of a defamation suit stemming from a comment somebody had left about a rival group.

Mr. Collins worries that similar cases will be brought by those hoping to quash public discourse on certain topics.

“The best public interest journalism and commentary is often defamatory and controversial,” he said. “This decision plainly chills the freedom to discuss these matters on these online platforms.”

Mr. Voller has defended his lawsuit. Now 24, he has publicly apologized for the crimes that landed him in juvenile detention, including assault, robbery and car theft. He has cited both his time in juvenile detention and the rumors circulating about him as damaging to his mental health.

Mr. Voller, an Indigenous man who is now a youth justice campaigner, said the court’s ruling would help protect vulnerable people in his community from the type of abuse he suffered online.

“Some of the comments made me feel suicidal,” he said. “I’m doing something right if I’m making people think about how to limit this type of thing from happening to other people in the future.”

Growth Capital For Online SaaS and App Businesses | Clearco
This is how you fund your business without giving up any Equity Click Here To Learn How!!

Previous Post

What is Nice Job and How does it work

Next Post

The self-sustaining house on wheels and other news

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

dropshipping spocket

How To Start Your Drop Shipping Business With Spocket in 2022!

Groove Funnels – We All Want A Free Sales Funnel Builder

Groove Funnels – We All Want A Free Sales Funnel Builder

Remote team management: 5 challenges and solutions

Remote team management: 5 challenges and solutions

WPFunnels – A Drag & Drop WordPress Sales Funnel Builder

WPFunnels – A Drag & Drop WordPress Sales Funnel Builder

Elementor plugin

Elementor | How Do You Get Your Website Started?

Emma email campaign

Emma | Personalized Email Marketing Solutions for your Business

A calendar that is actually useful, batch deferrals, and more.

A calendar that is actually useful, batch deferrals, and more.

8 Factors To Begin Using An Online Form – Forms on Fire 🔥

8 Factors To Begin Using An Online Form – Forms on Fire 🔥

Vendasta – All in One Platform For Success

Vendasta – All in One Platform For Success

Sanebox

SaneBox | Email AI To Keep You Sane

Red Pill for Sales CRM

What is VipeCloud? Sales CRM and Marketing Suite

AppMasterWorld.com

AppMasterWorld.com is for techies, who wants to be up to date before others. We work hard to serve you first and best of all and to satisfy your hunger of Technology. I hope you will get latest business, gaming, social media news and much more. If you have difficulty in any topic or doubt in mind. Just Feel Free to ask me in comment of that topic.

Trending Now

Do not hold your breath for Last Dream 16 at Tokyo Video Gam…

Adam Mosseri, Instagram’s Head, Agrees to Testify Before Congress

Spy x Family anime from WIT, CloverWorks revealed in first trailer

Bob’s Burgers will keep breaking rules in season 12, the eventual movie

About 20 Apple Stores Are Now Closed as the Omicron Variant Surges.

Most Popular

Upskirt photos shared in Facebook groups, BBC finds

Upskirt photos shared in Facebook groups, BBC finds

A Gene Sequencing Pioneer Battles Over What It Can Buy

A Gene Sequencing Pioneer Battles Over What It Can Buy

Lina Khan, a Big Tech Critic, Tries Answering Her Own Detractors

Lina Khan, a Big Tech Critic, Tries Answering Her Own Detractors

  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Sitemap
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Copyright. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • SOCIAL MEDIA
  • SAAS APPS
    • Marketing
    • Business
    • Creative Apps
    • Management Apps
    • Productivity Apps
    • Saas offers
  • GAMING
  • INDUSTRY

© 2021 Copyright. All rights reserved.

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT